VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

User avatar
bennit
Cadet
Posts: 496
Registered for: 13 years 7 months
Car Make: Audi, VW
Car Model: B8 3.2 fsi quattro, 9n3 1.6
Membership No: missing
Location: Mafikeng

VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by bennit »

I was paging through a mag and noticed that an abf motor is more pricier than a voora, why? Demand perhaps? Now i would like to know which is better motor overall, in terms of modding, and bang for buck. And how much are these motors rated standard, correct me if im wrong, vr6 128kw/240nm & abf 110kw? Maintanance wise? Abf parts, are they accessable?
[img][IMG]http://i1033.photobucket.com/albums/a41 ... d945c6.jpg[/img][/img]
ACCIDENTS HAPPENS AT 100KM/H
young gun
Cadet
Posts: 658
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: 1988 Jetta mk2 cli
Membership No: missing

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by young gun »

many different factors would depend on making a choice like that.
User avatar
dazza
Field Marshal
Posts: 12139
Registered for: 16 years 3 months
Car Make: VW and VW
Car Model: Amarok and Citi Sport
Membership No: 1327
Location: Roodepoort

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by dazza »

bennit wrote:I was paging through a mag and noticed that an abf motor is more pricier than a voora, why? Demand perhaps? Now i would like to know which is better motor overall, in terms of modding, and bang for buck. And how much are these motors rated standard, correct me if im wrong, vr6 128kw/240nm & abf 110kw? Maintanance wise? Abf parts, are they accessable?
ABF is rated at 110kw at the fly but it was beleived there was word that they were actually detuned to 110kw in Europe and are more like 125kw at the fly.
Vr6 is nice but the ABF is a real gem.
Darryn Van Rooyen
Current: 17 Amarok V6 D/C 4Motion H/L Auto
Current: 1987 Citi Sport 1.6
Current: 91 Citi Sport 1.3
Current: 05 Kawasaki 200KDX, 16 KTM 300 EXC
Previous:
14 Amarok BITDI D/C 4Motion H/L Auto
12' MKVI GTI Manual
2009 Audi TT 2.0TFSI S-Tronic
2008 Honda CBX250 Twister - Crashed!
2011 Amarok BiTDI D/C Highline 4Motion
08 RS MKV GTI DSG
09 ZG Ibiza Cupra TDI
06 CW Sportline
01 Citi 1.4i
01 Yamaha YZ125
99 Toyota Tazz
94 Fox 1.8 Sport
User avatar
Fiefster
Cadet
Posts: 116
Registered for: 12 years 9 months
Car Make: Volkswagen
Car Model: 2005 1.4 CitiGolf
Membership No: missing
Location: Far far away...

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Fiefster »

Id also say depends on what you want. Lets say you want to fit it into a citi golf then there is no point in fitting the VR as it will cost you a lot more and will require much more work. Where as in a golf 3 body its a different story. There the VR conversion might still be more expensive (stand corrected) but Id say way more worth fitting than the abf.
Nuclear powered spaceship

Disguised as a 1400 citiGolf
dogg
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 4314
Registered for: 17 years 3 months
Car Make: vw
Car Model: caddy
Membership No: 1507
Location: woodmead area

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by dogg »

Gizmo20VT wrote:i say visa versa.. vr = king
+11ty billion.. I had an Original Golf 3 2door ABF and I wanted a VR but my reason was for the tone of the motor.
Performance didn't bother me much.
Image

Current :
2005 bagged caddy pickup

Ex :
The list exceeds the character limit
User avatar
Velofox
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 4427
Registered for: 16 years
Car Make: VW
Car Model: '94 FoxT 2.0 16v'
Membership No: 1314
Location: The Land of Milk and Honey...

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Velofox »

dogg wrote:
Gizmo20VT wrote:i say visa versa.. vr = king
+11ty billion.. I had an Original Golf 3 2door ABF and I wanted a VR but my reason was for the tone of the motor.
Performance didn't bother me much.
oh yeah...
Current Rides
1994 2.0 16v FoxT - Lexy
1998 2.0 8v Mk3 GTI - Liesy

My Inspiration
16vT Engine Pics

Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Killerwatt
VWCSA Member
Posts: 4819
Registered for: 15 years 11 months
Car Make: AUDI
Car Model: S3
Membership No: missing
Location: Brakenhurst

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Killerwatt »

Both motors have their own pros and cons, i think slightly more cons for the vr. But you will never ever in a million years get an abf to sound like a vr6. So i vote VR. :lol:
User avatar
CRASH_IT
Cadet
Posts: 996
Registered for: 17 years 6 months
Car Make: Audi
Car Model: 8P S3
Membership No: 1540
Location: Alberton, JHB

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by CRASH_IT »

dazza wrote:
bennit wrote:I was paging through a mag and noticed that an abf motor is more pricier than a voora, why? Demand perhaps? Now i would like to know which is better motor overall, in terms of modding, and bang for buck. And how much are these motors rated standard, correct me if im wrong, vr6 128kw/240nm & abf 110kw? Maintanance wise? Abf parts, are they accessable?
ABF is rated at 110kw at the fly but it was beleived there was word that they were actually detuned to 110kw in Europe and are more like 125kw at the fly.
Vr6 is nice but the ABF is a real gem.

correct
CURRENT RIDE
2013 VW transporter 2.0TDI
2007 Audi S3

EX
- 2014 Ford Fiesta ST
- 1993 1.8i CITI MP9 98HP 147NM @ KAR
NOW:2.0 ABF 117HP 158NM @Panics on XMS (SOLD)SNIFF
http://www.vwclub.co.za/phpbb3/viewtopi ... 3&t=108203
Image
User avatar
SHAUN
Post Whore
Posts: 29491
Registered for: 19 years 9 months
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: 2006 335i
Membership No: 1148
Location: WildWest

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by SHAUN »

Id love a VR motor in a mk1, even if so many go against it, i just dont want the fuel consumption lol
2006 E92 335i * Monica
2001 Audi S3 Quattro * Suzie-Q
1999 Jetta 3 20vt 181kw 390nm * Jet-Li
2006 Caddy 1.6 low and slow * Tossa-Caddy
2001 Polo classic 16v ABF Featured * BLUEmotion
1988 Bmw E30 2.9L - Written off
1991 MKII GTI - Sold
1989 MKII CSL - Sold
Saiendra wrote: I cannot argue with you, you bought a BMW out of motorplan...
You clearly have more balls than me.
User avatar
panic-mechanic
Panic's Place
Posts: 26715
Registered for: 21 years 8 months
Membership No: 79
Location: Benoni, putfontein.

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by panic-mechanic »

ABF all in all is much better bang for buck.
Stephan van Tonder - Jhb - Putfontein Benoni
'05 Audi A6 3.0L TDI Avant
'09 Touareg 3l TDI
'13 VW CC 2l tdi (repair project)
'05 Touareg v10

Perfect Power dealer. I do dyno tuning.
young gun
Cadet
Posts: 658
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: 1988 Jetta mk2 cli
Membership No: missing

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by young gun »

if you think with your head you are going to find yourself going the ABF route, but like everone is saying the smart money would go ABF as it does in all honesty out perform the VR, but if you do drop a VR in it its because its something you really want not because its the smarter choice. Im going VR in my jetta 2 for that exact reason, other option would be 2.0 20VT which would put both motors to shame!
joggiep
Lieutenant-General
Posts: 8881
Registered for: 20 years 4 months
Car Make: Audi
Car Model: Amarok V6
Membership No: 664
Location: Pretoria
Contact:

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by joggiep »

I stand to be corrected but getting ahold of VR6 gearboxes are aparently getting a bit difficult.. so there might be problem 1.
To make a VR6 go into a MK1 or 2 is going to be a lot more work the ABF is a lott less.
Then the weight of the VR6 wil effect handling more so than the ABF.

I agree with the VR6 for looks and the sound.
Joggie Pretorius
---------------------------------------
EX - CARS
Jetta CSX 1.8 8v
Golf CTi 1.8 8v
Polo 1.6 lux
SEAT Ibiza Sport
VW Polo 2.0 Highline
BMW E90 320D
VW Caddy 2.0 8V
Nissan X-trail 2.0 dCi
VW Jetta 2.0 16V Turbo
VW Polo 1.6 Comfortline
BMW 335
Suzuki SV1000S (125hp - 109NM)
Audi RSQ3
CURRENT CARS
VW Amarok V6 Exstream
User avatar
zain_c
Brigadier
Posts: 6009
Registered for: 14 years 3 months
Car Model: Accord + MK2 Jetta CSi
Membership No: missing
Location: Skaapstad

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by zain_c »

I'd go ABF for sure. Love that motor to bits...pity they so pricey. :sad:
2010 Honda Accord K24
1992 MK2 Jetta CSi

ex:
86 MK2 Jetta CLX
88 MK2 Golf CSL
14 6R Polo
97 Caddy
83 MK1 GTi
04 Citi 14.7 s2s Killarney
06 MK5 Golf
92 MK2 2.0 16v GTi Exec
88 MK2 CLi 1.9 16v 15.0 Killarney
96 MK3 GTS
young gun
Cadet
Posts: 658
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: 1988 Jetta mk2 cli
Membership No: missing

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by young gun »

I stand to be corrected but getting ahold of VR6 gearboxes are aparently getting a bit difficult..
+10000000000000000!!! fooking hard to get hold of, i have been looking for awhile now with no luck, but if you are prepared to pay, when one surfaces its not cheap at all.

VR swap into an mk2 in all honesty is not that difficult if you have all the parts.
User avatar
Forest
Lieutenant
Posts: 1720
Registered for: 15 years 1 month
Car Make: BMW
Car Model: 135i Coupe & S1000RR
Membership No: 1648
Location: Boksburg
Contact:

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Forest »

ABF with your current gearbox = R10 000
VR6 + VR6 gearbox (only 1 that works) = R10 000
Dont see a price differance....

Its all about supply and demand.
VR swop, usually only done in Mk3 VR6's = not high demand.
ABF works in almost any VW + its awesome = high demand.

VR6 FTMFW Haters!
Stock Standard '89 Golf Mk2 VR6 (Sold)
Project "Merge" Mk2VR6 - The Build
'86 Golf Mk2 AGU 2 Door (Sold)
Project "Tudor" Mk2AGU -The Build
User avatar
zain_c
Brigadier
Posts: 6009
Registered for: 14 years 3 months
Car Model: Accord + MK2 Jetta CSi
Membership No: missing
Location: Skaapstad

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by zain_c »

Forest wrote:VR6 FTMFW Haters
:lol: :lol:
2010 Honda Accord K24
1992 MK2 Jetta CSi

ex:
86 MK2 Jetta CLX
88 MK2 Golf CSL
14 6R Polo
97 Caddy
83 MK1 GTi
04 Citi 14.7 s2s Killarney
06 MK5 Golf
92 MK2 2.0 16v GTi Exec
88 MK2 CLi 1.9 16v 15.0 Killarney
96 MK3 GTS
Zubair
Major-General
Posts: 7404
Registered for: 21 years 2 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: MK1
Membership No: missing
Location: Johannesburg

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Zubair »

I would say ABF any day of the week, but lately I've been getting to drive a different Mk1 every week, and each has the same recipe, ABF, Dicktator,exhaust and what do you know, 130BHP atw. Its just too common(and for good reason). So I can't believe I'm going to say this, I'd like to drive a Mk1 with a VR6 6 pot in the front, and the 6 Pot sound out the rear, why? Because not everyone in my neighbourhood has one.
Ex '02 Citi.Com 20VT K04
Ex '12 GTI 6 Candy White,Manual,Revo STG 2, 250whp 460nm KAR pump fuel only.

'80 MK1 L 2Dr 8V Throttles
'92 CTI 16VT 240whp @ Panic 0.3 bars boost.
'12 GTI 6 Candy White DSG 14.4 @ 160km/h Tarlton Stock Std.


Zubair Aka Boost Junkie

ZUB-AIR-RESEARCH
Boost Developments
User avatar
zain_c
Brigadier
Posts: 6009
Registered for: 14 years 3 months
Car Model: Accord + MK2 Jetta CSi
Membership No: missing
Location: Skaapstad

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by zain_c »

aaaaah...i'd like to cruise Big Ron style too. :drool: :drool:

so more or less how much would a VR6 transplant cost to put into a citi?
2010 Honda Accord K24
1992 MK2 Jetta CSi

ex:
86 MK2 Jetta CLX
88 MK2 Golf CSL
14 6R Polo
97 Caddy
83 MK1 GTi
04 Citi 14.7 s2s Killarney
06 MK5 Golf
92 MK2 2.0 16v GTi Exec
88 MK2 CLi 1.9 16v 15.0 Killarney
96 MK3 GTS
User avatar
Smok3X
Captain
Posts: 2032
Registered for: 15 years 1 month
Car Make: SEAT
Car Model: LEON CUPRA 2.0 TFSi K04
Membership No: 3083
Location: JHB

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Smok3X »

VR6 Sounds awesome! But not for a Citi if you ask me... you wont last too long once the cops stop you and open the bonnet!

ABF FTW! 125KW ATF Easy! with standard motor!
Current:
Leon CUPRA - 2.0TFSi K04--> Rides Thread
169WKW@Dark Artz - Stock
229WKW@Dark Artz - RevO 2+

Ex:
Ibiza CUPRA - 1.8 20V - Hybrid Turbo-->Rides Thread
Revo:182KW and 399NM@Experience
ABF Citi Golf - 2.0L 16V--->Rides Thread
FRC - 124KW and 198NM@Auto Trix
1/4 Mile:14.61s
1ST Place - 4AF2 Margate 31st Oct 2010

ImageImageImage
User avatar
panic-mechanic
Panic's Place
Posts: 26715
Registered for: 21 years 8 months
Membership No: 79
Location: Benoni, putfontein.

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by panic-mechanic »

I have driven a couple of mk1's with vr6 lump. All I can say is understeer......
In a mk2 and mk3 - yeah it's better but you also HAVE to upgrade springs and shocks and brakes for sure. As much as I love VR's I hate them. It's a fantastic sounding engine but in stock form it's pretty useless for it's capacity. Once you make it a 3.1 it's a heck of a lot better but it can use fuel that will make a sheik's eyes water.
I have genuinely played a lot with both and as I said ABF better bang for buck. When you leave reason at the door then yes the VR into other stuff becomes interesting and yes it stirs the soul for the sound and yes - it's not as common as the ABF. Then again I have a REAL soft spot for those 1.8 20v turbos......
Stephan van Tonder - Jhb - Putfontein Benoni
'05 Audi A6 3.0L TDI Avant
'09 Touareg 3l TDI
'13 VW CC 2l tdi (repair project)
'05 Touareg v10

Perfect Power dealer. I do dyno tuning.
User avatar
dazza
Field Marshal
Posts: 12139
Registered for: 16 years 3 months
Car Make: VW and VW
Car Model: Amarok and Citi Sport
Membership No: 1327
Location: Roodepoort

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by dazza »

Does anyone know exactly the weight difference between the ABF and VR6 motor...how much extra weight we talking?
Darryn Van Rooyen
Current: 17 Amarok V6 D/C 4Motion H/L Auto
Current: 1987 Citi Sport 1.6
Current: 91 Citi Sport 1.3
Current: 05 Kawasaki 200KDX, 16 KTM 300 EXC
Previous:
14 Amarok BITDI D/C 4Motion H/L Auto
12' MKVI GTI Manual
2009 Audi TT 2.0TFSI S-Tronic
2008 Honda CBX250 Twister - Crashed!
2011 Amarok BiTDI D/C Highline 4Motion
08 RS MKV GTI DSG
09 ZG Ibiza Cupra TDI
06 CW Sportline
01 Citi 1.4i
01 Yamaha YZ125
99 Toyota Tazz
94 Fox 1.8 Sport
dogg
Lieutenant-Colonel
Posts: 4314
Registered for: 17 years 3 months
Car Make: vw
Car Model: caddy
Membership No: 1507
Location: woodmead area

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by dogg »

dazza wrote:Does anyone know exactly the weight difference between the ABF and VR6 motor...how much extra weight we talking?
Its not only the weight in the Mk1/Citi.. its the way the motor sits in the engine bay. It sits basically on top of the front suspension more towards the slam try. One can almost stand in the space in the back of the motor with a hair dryer for some Forced Induction.
Image

Current :
2005 bagged caddy pickup

Ex :
The list exceeds the character limit
Monster
Lieutenant
Posts: 1119
Registered for: 15 years 3 months
Membership No: missing
Location: Pretoria

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Monster »

Zubair wrote:...... ABF ...... Its just too common(and for good reason)...
Why i put a t on mine, not too many of those around. (methinks)
BMW k1200RS
young gun
Cadet
Posts: 658
Registered for: 14 years 7 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: 1988 Jetta mk2 cli
Membership No: missing

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by young gun »

Its not only the weight in the Mk1/Citi.. its the way the motor sits in the engine bay. It sits basically on top of the front suspension more towards the slam try. One can almost stand in the space in the back of the motor with a hair dryer for some Forced Induction.
Yebo. the VR motor mounts in such a way that it sits pretty much straight up whereas your normal 4 pot sit slanted backwards.

And i stand to be corrected but the difference in weight between a 4 pot setup and the VR is only like 80 pounds. same thing was asked on vwvortex
User avatar
Ansell
Cadet
Posts: 181
Registered for: 9 years 6 months
Car Make: VW
Car Model: 1997 Golf 3
Location: Somerset West, Cape Town

Re: VR6 vs ABF which is better motor....

Post by Ansell »

Yeah. The ABF in a MK3 is 1115kgs and the VR6 in a MK3 is 1180kgs. All 5 doors. That's about 65kgs difference. The ABF has about 10.13kgs per kw and the VR6 is about 9.21kgs per kw. This is just in the case of a MK3 that the VR6 has better power to weight. For comparison my MK3 is a 1.8 MP9 which is 1035kgs and 82kw which gives it a power to weight of about 12.6kgs per kw. All in all, booooyaaa!
Current:
1997 Golf MK3 GSX (1.8 MP9)

Specs:
79.7kw at 5209rpm and 160nm at 4240rpm (Saichs Dyno)

Modifications:
Stock exhaust with one 50mm-57mm freeflow box.
Standard airbox
Standard cam

Ex: 1970 Beetle 1300 twin-port


If you don't look back at your car after you park it, then you own the wrong car.
Post Reply