lol only time you'll see that figures on your deed of sale is in Zimbabwe.dynamic wrote:I was hoping to let my 1981 2 door mk1 go for 250k after seeing that advert
Does Neuk still have that GLS though?
lol only time you'll see that figures on your deed of sale is in Zimbabwe.dynamic wrote:I was hoping to let my 1981 2 door mk1 go for 250k after seeing that advert
Yep.Mk1Crazee wrote:Does Neuk still have that GLS though?
and supposedly a van too..............Neuk wrote:Yep.Mk1Crazee wrote:Does Neuk still have that GLS though?
EX-DOHCTOR wrote: I'd make sure I understand the differences between fish and engine components before attempting any modifications on my motor vehicle as a start.
Psycho1400 wrote:It wasn't an oil leak, it was a horsepower sweat...
A bus but yes.MarshallGTi wrote:and supposedly a van too..............Neuk wrote:Yep.Mk1Crazee wrote:Does Neuk still have that GLS though?
Mk1Crazee wrote:lol only time you'll see that figures on your deed of sale is in Zimbabwe.dynamic wrote:I was hoping to let my 1981 2 door mk1 go for 250k after seeing that advert
Does Neuk still have that GLS though?
It was a 2.0 motor.EX-DOHCTOR wrote:The only exception being the Citi R, which had a ricey body kit and a 1.8i motor. Nothing particularly special about it but people **** their pants and paid ridiculous amounts of money for it.
Supervan II wrote:It was a 2.0 motor.EX-DOHCTOR wrote:The only exception being the Citi R, which had a ricey body kit and a 1.8i motor. Nothing particularly special about it but people **** their pants and paid ridiculous amounts of money for it.
Lol nah boss citi NEVER came with a 2.0l it was indeed a 1.8iSly_Dub wrote:Supervan II wrote:It was a 2.0 motor.EX-DOHCTOR wrote:The only exception being the Citi R, which had a ricey body kit and a 1.8i motor. Nothing particularly special about it but people **** their pants and paid ridiculous amounts of money for it.
Ah, that 90KW fooled me.Mk1Crazee wrote:Lol nah boss citi NEVER came with a 2.0l it was indeed a 1.8iSly_Dub wrote:Supervan II wrote:It was a 2.0 motor.EX-DOHCTOR wrote:The only exception being the Citi R, which had a ricey body kit and a 1.8i motor. Nothing particularly special about it but people **** their pants and paid ridiculous amounts of money for it.
Wasn't 90kwSupervan II wrote:Ah, that 90KW fooled me.Mk1Crazee wrote:Lol nah boss citi NEVER came with a 2.0l it was indeed a 1.8iSly_Dub wrote:Supervan II wrote: It was a 2.0 motor.
Correct. VW claimed their 1.8i pushed out 90KW not too bad thoughSly_Dub wrote:It actually was, or it was supposed to be. See link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Citi_Golf
Car came standard with a 272 cam iirc.Mk1Crazee wrote:Correct. VW claimed their 1.8i pushed out 90KW not too bad thoughSly_Dub wrote:It actually was, or it was supposed to be. See link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Citi_Golf
EX-DOHCTOR wrote: I'd make sure I understand the differences between fish and engine components before attempting any modifications on my motor vehicle as a start.
Psycho1400 wrote:It wasn't an oil leak, it was a horsepower sweat...
MarshallGTi wrote:all these rumours and confusion is part of what made all the special editions sell so well lol
I couldn't agree less, it is purely down to South Africans believing they have some holy **** grail special limited exclusiv edition, that doesn't exist. The Karmann Edition Cabrio's come to mind...MarshallGTi wrote:all these rumours and confusion is part of what made all the special editions sell so well lol
There were a few other 1.8i as well same 272 cam etc but no body kit at the end of the R run.panic-mechanic wrote:The only really special edition was the R with the 1.8 and 272 cam fitted.
The rest was the same old 1.6 with fancy stripes.
I do recall seeing one before, looked like a normal citi but with a 1.8i badge. Wasn't aware it had the cam as well, inconspicuous little car!Abnormal wrote:There were a few other 1.8i as well same 272 cam etc but no body kit at the end of the R run.panic-mechanic wrote:The only really special edition was the R with the 1.8 and 272 cam fitted.
The rest was the same old 1.6 with fancy stripes.
My apologies, was under the impression it was a 83kwSly_Dub wrote:It actually was, or it was supposed to be. See link.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Citi_Golf
I was actually saying the exact same thing the other day .smitbrandon wrote:IMHO a citi is a citi. If youstrip it of the dash and rims and fuel injection. It's just another chico... I will never pay anything over R30k for any citi
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
oh wow interestingICE King wrote:Interesting - According to the readers Digest dated 1988 , A entry citigolf new was R4000 while a brand new MK2 1.8 16 valve costed R9800
4k is two new tires these days - not evens
Rourke wrote:oh wow interestingICE King wrote:Interesting - According to the readers Digest dated 1988 , A entry citigolf new was R4000 while a brand new MK2 1.8 16 valve costed R9800
4k is two new tires these days - not evens